Category Archives: Uncategorized

Leveraging Data to Mitigate Legal Risk: Inside Ogletree’s Workforce Analytics and Compliance Practice Group



In this podcast, Scott Kelly (shareholder, Birmingham) sits down with Tim Fox, the Director of Ogletree’s Practice Innovation and Analytics team, to discuss the firm’s new Workforce Analytics and Compliance Practice Group. Scott, who chairs the practice group, and Tim explain how the new group utilizes the firm’s data analytics capabilities to help employers with compliance in a wide range of challenging areas, including equal employment opportunity, government reporting, and pay equity. They also discuss how a multidisciplinary approach enables legal and analytics professionals to collaborate in assisting employers throughout the employment life cycle, from hiring and compensation to benefits and retention.


Workplace Strategies Watercooler 2025: A Ransomware Incident Response Simulation, Part 2



In part two of our Cybersecurity installment of our Workplace Strategies Watercooler 2025 podcast series, Ben Perry (shareholder, Nashville) and Justin Tarka (partner, London) discuss the steps to take after resolving and containing a ransomware incident. Justin and Ben, who is co-chair of the firm’s Cybersecurity and Privacy Practice Group, highlight several key areas, including preparing the response team, implementing training for relevant employees and regular reviews of cybersecurity measures; developing a comprehensive incident response plan and assembling a dedicated response team; identifying opportunities for long-term infrastructure improvements; and assessing other areas of external risk management, such as data mapping and retention processes, vendor due diligence, and notification obligations.


Cross Border Catch-Up: Employer Responsibilities in Global Business Travel



In this episode of our Cross-Border Catch-Up podcast series, Patty Shapiro (shareholder, San Diego) and Maya Barba (associate, San Francisco) discuss key considerations for short-term international business travel. Maya and Patty explore the distinction between “business activity” and “productive work”—a difference that can determine whether work authorization is required. They also touch on duty of care and what that means for employers supporting employees on international business travel.


2024 EEO-1 Final Countdown: Key Reporting Tips



In this podcast, Jay Patton (shareholder, Birmingham) and Kiosha Dickey (counsel, Columbia) provide an update on significant changes to EEO-1 filing obligations. Kiosha and Jay discuss the shorter EEO-1 filing window, which opened on May 20, 2025, and which will close on June 24, 2025. They also discuss the removal of the non-binary reporting option in alignment with Executive Order 14168 and discuss its implications for employers. Kiosha and Jay offer practical tips for reporting remote employees, emphasizing the importance of correctly assigning fully remote staff based on their supervisor’s location. They also cover the critical steps for reporting mergers, acquisitions, and spinoffs, highlighting the need for early preparation and accurate data collection.


Workplace Strategies Watercooler 2025: A Ransomware Incident Response Simulation, Part 1



In part one of our Cybersecurity installment of our Workplace Strategies Watercooler 2025 podcast series, Ben Perry (shareholder, Nashville) and Justin Tarka (partner, London) discuss key factors employers should consider when facing ransomware incidents. The speakers begin by simulating an incident response and outlining the necessary steps to take after a security breach occurs. Justin and Ben, who is co-chair of the firm’s Cybersecurity and Privacy Practice Group, discuss best practices when investigating a ransomware incident, assessing the impact of the incident, containing the situation, communicating with stakeholders, fulfilling notification requirements, and adhering to reporting obligations. The speakers also address considerations when responding to ransom requests, including performing a cost-benefit analysis regarding payment, reviewing insurance coverage, identifying potential litigation risks, fulfilling ongoing notification obligations, addressing privacy concerns, and more.


Cross-Border Catch-Up: Understanding International Anti-Harassment Training Laws



In this episode of our Cross-Border Catch-Up podcast series, Maya Barba (San Francisco) and Kate Thompson (New York, Boston) discuss the intricacies of mandatory anti-harassment training and policies across various countries. Kate and Maya provide an overview of the requirements in Australia, China, South Korea, India, Romania, and Peru, among other countries. The speakers  review which employees need to be trained, the duration and frequency of required training programs, and the types of harassment, including sexual harassment, discrimination, and bullying, that these trainings must cover.


Workplace Strategies Watercooler 2025: When Good Cases Go Bad—Top HR Mistakes Leading to Big Jury Verdicts



In this installment of our Workplace Strategies Watercooler 2025 podcast series, Jim Paul (shareholder, St. Louis/Tampa), Julianne Pinter (senior counsel, Torrance), and Vince Verde (shareholder, Orange County) discuss large runaway jury verdicts and strategies to avoid them. The speakers begin by reviewing statistics that highlight several reasons for the trend of “nuclear verdicts,” citing contributing factors such as jury attitudes towards management and employers, witness and counsel credibility, lack of documentation supporting the disputed adverse employment action, and perceptions about the fairness of the law. The speakers then look at examples of substantial runaway verdicts and share insights on preventive measures that can be implemented at the HR level, including seeking legal counsel early in the process and ensuring proper employee training, documentation, and thorough investigations.


Litigation Lens: Insights From Recent Age Discrimination Litigation



In Ogletree Deakins’ new podcast series Litigation Lens, Shareholder Michael Nail (Greenville) will discuss and analyze real employment law cases and outcomes to provide listeners with practical takeaways and insights. In the inaugural episode, Michael is joined by Sarah Zucco (of counsel, New York) to discuss a recent summary judgment opinion from the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas regarding a case involving a supervisor who was allegedly “forced” to retire for failing to report a sexual harassment complaint, as required by company policy. The plaintiff alleged that he was the victim of age discrimination; however, the court found the employer’s decision was legitimate and not pretextual. This episode provides practical tips for employers on how to handle similar situations.


Workplace Strategies Watercooler 2025: The EEOC’s Updated Workplace Harassment Guidance One Year Later



In this installment of our Workplace Strategies Watercooler 2025 podcast series, Sherry Talton (shareholder, Houston/Seattle) and Fiona Ong (shareholder, Baltimore) discuss the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) 2024 updated workplace harassment guidance. With the shift in enforcement focus under the new administration, Fiona and Sherry emphasize the importance of staying informed and adapting to the evolving legal landscape. This includes awareness of state and municipal laws that may provide specific protections against harassment, especially regarding sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI). They offer practical tips for developing an effective anti-harassment policy, establishing a robust complaint and reporting process, and implementing sound training and investigation protocols.


Safety Perspectives From the Dallas Region: Challenging OSHA’s Judicial Process



In this episode of our Safety Perspectives From the Dallas Region podcast series, shareholders John Surma (Houston) and Frank Davis (Dallas) discuss pending litigation regarding the constitutionality of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) administrative law judges (ALJs). Frank and John review the arguments supporting the claim that the current system for handling workplace safety disputes is unconstitutional. They specifically highlight issues such as the absence of the right to a jury trial, improper appointments of judges, restrictions on the president’s authority to remove judges, and an insufficient number of OSHRC members to adequately review cases.