Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 18:09 — 25.0MB) | Embed

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | TuneIn | More

In this episode of Ogletree Deakins’ Litigation Lens podcast series, shareholders Michael Nail (Greenville) and Fiona Ong (Baltimore) dissect a Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals case concerning an accommodation request brought under the Rehabilitation Act. The speakers explain why the Seventh Circuit found the employer’s alternative accommodation reasonable in a case involving a VA hospital employee’s request for parking and scooter storage amid COVID-19-related entrance changes. Michael and Fiona—emphasize that accommodations must be effective, not perfect—and cover the interactive process, changing accommodations without proving undue hardship, and damages considerations.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 9:43 — 13.4MB) | Embed

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | TuneIn | More

In this episode of Ogletree Deakins’ EEOC Exclusive podcast series, Adam Dougherty (shareholder, Dallas), D’Ontae D. Sylvertooth (shareholder, Washington), and Sean Oliveira (associate, St. Louis) discuss the priorities, philosophy, and early actions of the new EEOC leadership, exploring what the Commission’s approach (both before and after quorum) means for employers, employees, and ongoing enforcement. The speakers break down how shifts on DEI, religious accommodation, pregnancy-related policies, and systemic enforcement could reshape compliance strategies for employers and litigation risk in the months ahead.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 23:49 — 32.8MB) | Embed

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | TuneIn | More

In this podcast, Meagan Dziura (Raleigh) and Awanti Damle Sharda (Raleigh) provide a comprehensive update on the latest H-1B cap lottery results, highlighting increased selection rates, a sharp drop in multiple registrations, and the potential for a new wage-weighted selection system. The speakers also discuss practical next steps for employers and employees not selected in the lottery, including alternative visa options and strategic planning for future H-1B seasons.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 12:45 — 17.5MB) | Embed

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | TuneIn | More

In this episode of our EEOC Exclusive podcast series, Adam Dougherty (shareholder, Dallas) sits down with D’Ontae Sylvertooth (shareholder, Washington) and Sean Oliveira (associate, St. Louis) to deliver a clear, timely breakdown of what a government shutdown means, why it happens, and how it affects everything from employers to federal workers to everyday services. The speakers unpack the politics and process behind funding standoffs, the real-world consequences for businesses, and what to watch in the days ahead.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 16:32 — 22.8MB) | Embed

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | TuneIn | More

In this podcast, Heather Ptasznik (shareholder, Detroit (Metro)) breaks down the challenges of managing intermittent Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) leave, from spotting red flags of potential abuse to maintaining consistency and morale. Heather shares practical tools for employers—clear call-out policies, certifications and recertifications, second opinions, lawful surveillance, and manager training—to keep programs compliant, fair, and defensible.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 9:43 — 13.4MB) | Embed

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | TuneIn | More

In this episode of our Cross-Border Catch-Up podcast series, Carlos Colón-Machargo and Kate Thompson explore the legal complexities of reductions in force (RIFs) across the Caribbean. In this episode, the speakers unpack the differences between individual and collective redundancies, highlight key procedural requirements and jurisdictional quirks, and offer practical tips to help employers navigate RIFs without triggering litigation.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 19:11 — 26.4MB) | Embed

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | TuneIn | More

In this episode of our Safety Perspectives From the Dallas Region podcast series, shareholders John Surma (Houston) and Frank Davis (Dallas) discuss the recent Fifth Circuit decision that found the dual for-cause removal protections for administrative law judges (ALJs) at the National Labor Relations Board unconstitutional, and its implications for the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC). The speakers break down how this ruling could halt OSHA enforcement proceedings in the Fifth Circuit, potentially render the current OSHRC structure unconstitutional, and force Congress to revisit the statutory framework for workplace safety adjudication.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 25:41 — 35.3MB) | Embed

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | TuneIn | More

In this episode of Ogletree Deakins’ Safety Basics podcast series, shareholders John Surma (Houston) and Karen Tynan (Sacramento) discuss the intricacies of state plans in comparison to federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations. John and Karen, who is co-chair of Ogletree’s Workplace Safety and Health Practice Group, explore the processes for approval and monitoring, highlight differences in recording and reporting requirements, and examine the nuances of inspections, citations, appeals, and settlements in states that have their own plans.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 16:12 — 22.3MB) | Embed

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | TuneIn | More

In this second episode of Ogletree Deakins’ new podcast series Litigation Lens, Michael Nail (Greenville) is joined by Fiona Ong (Baltimore) and Sarah Zucco (New York) to discuss a recent Second Circuit decision that clarifies employers’ obligations to provide reasonable accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)—even when an employee can technically perform essential job functions without them. The speakers unpack the facts of a case involving a New York teacher’s request for accommodations due to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), explain the court’s rejection of a “necessity-only” standard, and offer practical tips for navigating the fact-intensive, multi-jurisdictional landscape of disability accommodation law.